J.L. Torres On Writing the Puerto Rican Diaspora

by J.L. Torres

My second book of short fiction, Migrations, is a thematic collection focusing on selected moments in Puerto Rican history and their impact on everyday people.  Searching for a strong epigraph that could convey the historical essence of the collection, I stumbled across the opening sentence in an essay found in Victor Hernández Cruz’s Red Beans: “Migration is the story of my body.”  With these seven words, Hernández Cruz, a Puerto Rican poet whom Life Magazine named one of America’s greatest poets in 1981, not only epitomized the thematic thread running through my collection, but he aptly described the lives of so many Puerto Ricans, including me.

Most people would not readily associate the migration out of Puerto Rico as a diaspora.  The word is mostly connected to the Jewish diaspora, although the movement of human beings from one region of the globe to another is a constant in world history. Puerto Ricans leaving the archipelago known as their homeland has been primarily a twentieth-century phenomenon, with the biggest waves coming after World War II.  Our migratory history began earlier than that, though. Migration is literally the story of our DNA. Our ancestors had origins in Spain, other European countries, Western Africa, and even the indigenous Tainos were descendants of tribes from the Orinoco region.  The earliest recorded number of Puerto Ricans in the United States was 196 in Lousiana, 1860, but most of our migratory history until the twentieth century was static, our lives quite insular. 

The Spanish-American War dramatically changed all of that. After the United States invaded Puerto Rico in 1898 and colonized it—and later forced citizenship on its inhabitants in 1917 to fight in World War I—the migratory flow out of the islands increased exponentially. At first, the expensive cost of sea travel to the mainland stifled any desire to migrate.  With the advent of affordable air travel in the forties and fifties, the number of Puerto Ricans leaving the islands grew. Between 1940 and 1970, over 835 thousand Puerto Ricans packed their bags and ventured to a new life in the States. I was one of them.  Our arrival at Idlewild Airport (now JFK) on that cold, rainy April day in 1960, was such a powerful memory that decades later I would write a poem about it. For a five-year-old traveling in an airplane for the first time, hearing the foreign sounds of English, absorbing the strange sights, the only thought in my mind was the adventure waiting for me in this new land. In my innocence, I could not have imagined that my mother was trying to reconcile with my father, and that the trip would be their last futile attempt at salvaging a failing relationship. In that way, our departure was different from many other Puerto Ricans who came before and would come later. My mother was fortunate to hold a job working at one of many emerging 936 factories on the main island. Later she would tell me that it was not just my father who motivated her to leave the security of that job. It was a wanderlust that I probably inherited. Other Puerto Ricans did not have such options. 

The main force behind the diaspora has always been the economic instability that creates chronic unemployment and poverty. Meanwhile, factories in the United States, along with agribusinesses, have actively recruited Puerto Ricans. This typical push-pull effect was the primal reason for major waves in our migration. But disasters have also played a major role. In 1898, Hurricane San Ciriaco devastated the sugar industry and forced many sugarcane workers to migrate to Hawaii, an event that serves as the basis for one of the stories in my collection. More recently Hurricane Maria and a series of earthquakes, along with nagging debt and imposed austerity measures, have sparked a new wave in migration, most of which has settled in Florida. Today, there are more Puerto Ricans in the States than in Puerto Rico.  Puerto Ricans reside in all fifty states, something that makes me wonder what the life of a Caribbean person in Alaska must be like. Surely, there is a story there.

Torres.png

In fact, every Puerto Rican’s migration is a story. The title of my collection, Migrations, operates as a metonymy for “stories.”  Those stories include experiencing the migratory process as a brutal assault on our bodies. I still recall my mother coming home from a day at the factory, flecks of cloth covering her hair, as she hastened to cook dinner.  Or her hunched over a sewing machine in our South Bronx apartment, surrounded by dozens of sacks of piecework. Or my stepfather losing three fingers trying to clean a faulty snowblower. Like any writer, I am always searching for story ideas. Recently, a colleague emailed me a scholarly article on Puerto Rican adolescents shipped off to the Carlisle Industrial School, the “crown jewel” among residential schools designed to “kill the Indian and save the man.” My ignorance of this incident in Puerto Rican history appalled me. I realized that if these historical events were buried, they needed to be excavated and put to paper. This new awareness compelled me to write a story about those young people at Carlisle, and to research other similar stories for a collection embedded in Puerto Rican history. The result of that effort is Migrations.

As a writer of Puerto Rican descent, I have always felt a responsibility to serve as a voice for my people. To serve in that capacity requires understanding that our bodies and minds represent the consequences of continuous disruptions suffered under our colonial condition. It means accepting that we are all the Diasporican in Mariposa Fernández’s poem. That our diaspora is not only about dispersion and displacement. It is also about our shared psychological, physical, and historic trauma; and for me, it is what fuels the imaginary that drives my writing.

J.L. Torres was born in Cayey, Puerto Rico, a town in the center of the island, and grew up in the South Bronx. After his formal education he returned to the island to find roots and material for his writing. Now he lives in New York and teaches literature and creative writing at SUNY. His work focuses on the Puerto Rican “diasporica”: living in in-betweeness. He is exploring what it means to live a life yearning for belonging when you’re told nation and home are empty concepts, and you have no historical memory of what they ever meant. His latest book features a cast of characters estranged from their loved ones, family, culture, and collective history. It is the inaugural winner of the Tomas Rivera Prize from the L.A. Review of Books.

Kira Leigh on Feeling Your Story Deeply

Inspiration is a funny thing. It can come to us like a lightning bolt, through the lyrics of a song, or in the fog of a dream. Ask any writer where their stories come from and you’ll get a myriad of answers, and in that vein I created the WHAT (What the Hell Are you Thinking?) interview. Always including in the WHAT is one random question to really dig down into the interviewees mind, and probably supply some illumination into my own as well.

Today’s guest for the WHAT is Kira Leigh author of the upcoming debut series, Constelis Voss, a queer, anime-inspired, psychological sci-fi trilogy.

Ideas for our books can come from just about anywhere, and sometimes even we can’t pinpoint exactly how or why. Did you have a specific origin point for your book? 

As I’ve been writing CONSTELIS VOSS in various forms for over 3+ years—and I’ve had the characters for far longer than that—it’s really hard to pin down an origin point. It comes from a lot of places: real-life challenges I’ve faced, my love for 90s anime, the hardships of my friends, and wishing that we could all just cut through the arbitrary bull of hegemonic life and start really caring for each other as the messy, imperfect people we are.

To get to that point, I worked backwards: to tackle a problem, we have to identify it, analyze it, find its weak points, and destroy it. It’s a literary exercise in expelling demons on many fronts. Societal demons, personal demons, and the phantoms of what boxes constrict so many.

It’s so many different things, but I guess the easiest to package answer is that its origin is a contemporary absence, in many ways. 

I didn’t see many characters like me, stories I could relate to, or concepts I thought important to touch on. I knew they were out there, but they were in different genres. Different media pieces. Different time periods, even. The execution of what I want to see is so rare right now.

I had to write what I didn’t see happening, now. All passionately made art comes from defining what isn’t and what you want. It’s desire and longing. I wanted to read characters like me. Complicated, messy, imperfect, queer as the day is long. So I wrote them. I gave them important challenges to tackle—probably far too big for them to be honest—and hoped they’d succeed. 

It’s in that seed of absence, that origin of longing for reciprocity and true progress, that CONSTELIS VOSS was born. It’s messy. It’s not perfect. But it was created as a solution to the lack of something in contemporary media. I think I succeeded.

Once the original concept existed, how did you build a plot around it?

I’m a notorious pantser when it comes to writing. I more or less let the characters react to obstacles in play, concepts I find vital, or events that have to happen, and if it pans out it pans out.

I had an initial throughline because this story started as a DnD-esque roleplaying game. Think: group storytelling with multiple characters and writers. But as that story quietly fell away into the night, and I still had so much more I wanted to tackle, I started writing it all on my own.

I started with that basis, carried my ideas through, and it fell into place. It wasn’t a difficult concept to plot around, because it’s incredibly important to me.

Have you ever had the plot firmly in place, only to find it changing as the story moved from your mind to paper?

I don’t think meaning-making is generally static, so the notion of the plot/concept changing isn’t really a thing that I think about or something that bothers me. What I mean to say is that, well, there really aren’t any new ideas.  

There’s nothing inherently conjured that hasn’t been touched on before, in various media. Because of this, our stories and our concepts are often borrowed from the cultural and world-level tapestry of collective creativity. Moreover, the only actual true change we make as creatives in adapting the language of all the art that’s come before us is execution. Execution is everything.

Combining the prior ideas together; if meaning-making isn’t static (like life is ever-changing), and all ideas have been done but not quite in our way as individual creatives, change is natural and expected. Adhering to a rigid structure is foolish.

If the story had to diverge from the initial concept, there was a reason. Be it being inspired by a different form of media, a feeling, wanting to chase a beautiful/tragic idea, or otherwise.

In the end, if you’re good about truly staying in character and your concepts are as alive as your blood, you’ll never really lose your plot. Because it lives inside your bones.

Do story ideas come to you often, or is fresh material hard to come by? 

I am constantly inspired by everything and create on a daily basis. Either paintings, 3D animations, short stories, articles, or songs—you name it, I make it on a daily basis. Fresh material is easy. Having the energy and focus to devote to one specific thing? That’s challenging. Inspired by too much is a good problem to have, but I only have one brain and two hands.

Leigh.png

How do you choose which story to write next, if you’ve got more than one percolating?

It’s moreso about what would benefit the whole of the work most of all. I’m a true believer that form and function must be married in art, and that art is a conversation between the artist and the audience.  

The form of CONSTELIS VOSS needs to be married to what I’m intending to do; which is very many conceptual things. When I say this, I mean to say I have to look at the work as a whole and decide what the best next play is. For myself, and for prospective readers. 

Would they like to know more about the individual characters? Perhaps a segmented novella is in order. Would they want to see what happens next? Then a sequel, which I’m already working on. 

I’m working on both, to be honest. A prequel novella told from multiple perspectives in systematic chapters, and a fun sequel that breaks even more barriers.

Depending on reader feedback, and depending on how I feel about what the strongest conceptual next step is, the choice will be obvious upon the release of the third book in the CONSTELIS VOSS trilogy.

I take my next choices in art-making very seriously, especially considering it’s aiming to be a long-standing IP.

I have 3 cats and a Dalmatian (seriously, check my Instagram feed) and I usually have at least one or two snuggling with me when I write. Do you have a writing buddy, or do you find it distracting?

Cats are lovely. We only have 1. I love him, but earnestly he is very vocal, and I have focusing challenges. I find it pretty distracting to have a ‘writing buddy’ but I do like reading my work to people, or just asking for feedback as I’m making it, so I know the form and function (and concepts) are working well.

I don’t need complete silence or anything like this—I actually write chapters to music, specifically chosen to color the writing and give me a good pace to create at, much like real-life exercise. But if there’s too much outside interaction, I tend to lose my spot. Not unlike losing your place in line.

I’d love to just sit with my cat Rolly on my lap and type away, but he likes to meow and paw my nose if I spend too much time doing anything other than cuddling him. Which I love doing...but I’d definitely never write anything ever again if he was my writing buddy. He demands constant attention and he’s adorable enough that he’d get it :)